CREATORS OF THE COMPLIANCE TUNE-UP®

AARMR | ABA | ACAMS | ALTA | ARMCP | IAPP | IIA | MBA | MERS® | MISMO | NAMB

Showing posts with label Department of Housing and Urban Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Department of Housing and Urban Development. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

FHA Expands Lending Areas


We have received many inquiries from clients, colleagues, and the media regarding the Federal Housing Administration's (FHA) recently issued Mortgagee Letter 2011-34 (September 23, 2011), specifically with respect to single family lending areas.

In order to provide some details regarding this revision, we are offering the outline contained herein.

There are other significant changes in ML 2011-34. To learn more about other important changes and guidance given in ML 2011-34, please download and review this mortgagee letter from our Library.

Brief Synopsis

Briefly put, the significant change through this issuance is that lenders can now originate FHA loans nationwide without each branch being approved, but lenders must comply with local and state licensing and loan origination requirements.

The change to the single family lending area became effective on September 23, 2011.

Single Family Loan Origination Lending Area

FHA has expanded the single family origination lending area of each home office and registered branch office to include all HUD field office jurisdictions. This origination lending area is also known as a lender's Area Approved for Business (AAFB). It is maintained at the HUD field office jurisdiction level in FHA's system for implementation with any Credit Watch Terminations.

As stated above, lenders must meet each state's origination requirements.

In actuality, then, the "Single Family Originating Lending Areas" of HUD Handbook 4155.2 is rescinded.

Geographical Restrictions Removed

For purposes of any Credit Watch Terminations, the AAFB will be maintained at the HUD field office jurisdiction level.

Thus, this change eliminates the geographical restrictions previously imposed upon approved lenders, which limited an approved lender's FHA origination activity to the designated lending areas for each home office and registered branch office.

Before and After

Before this issuance:
A specific HUD approved office could only make loans in a geographically designated lending area, provided that the lender met the loan origination requirements of each state in which the loans were made.
After this issuance:
An FHA single-family lender may originate loans nationally from a home or branch office, provided that the lender meets the loan origination requirements of each state in which the loans are made.
LIBRARY

Law Library Image
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Revised Lender Approval Requirements
Federal Housing Administration
Mortgagee Letter 2011-34
September 23, 2011

Friday, August 5, 2011

HUD: Administrative Actions - Avoiding the Mortgagee Review Board

Foxx_(2009.04.02)
Jonathan Foxx is the President and Managing Director of Lenders Compliance Group.Separater-Grey
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published the Administrative Actions taken by the Mortgagee Review Board (MRB) against certain FHA mortgagees. The period covered in the issuance is October 23, 2009 to February 7, 2011.
The MRB has the authority to issue Settlement Agreements, Civil Money Penalties, Withdrawals of Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Approval, Suspensions, Probations, Reprimands, and Administrative Payments.
Or to put this in more modern parlance, the MRB is empowered to enforce administrative sanctions, including reprimand, probation, suspension or withdrawal of approval, cease-and-desist orders, and civil money penalties
Trust me - you don't want to go there!
Line-Webpage
What May Yet Happen
In representing clients before the MRB, I can vouch for the exhaustive due diligence that is virtually mandated, the considerable costs involved, the experienced legal counsel and requisite regulatory compliance expertise that is needed, and the significant adverse impact on an FHA lender's ability to conduct or even continue in business.
It's easy to get lulled into a sense of false confidence by thinking that some violations are minor. But if the MRB gets involved, those minor violations will become a part of the causes for administrative action, and even in some instances the proximate cause of the administrative action.
Nothing should be considered a "minor" violation, when originating HUD/FHA mortgage loans.
So it is instructive to take note of the causes for administrative action against a HUD-approved mortgagee. Ignorance is a futile defense, when it comes to the causes that can affirmatively contribute to disciplinary action.
It should also be noted that the MRB withdrew FHA approval from 123 mortgagees because those lenders were not in compliance with HUD's annual recertification requirements.
Below is a list of 50 causes upon which the MRB has taken administrative action. In many cases, the civil monetary penalties were very large.
Line-Webpage
50 Causes of Administrative Actions
A Very Partial List
1) Failed to maintain and implement a Quality Control Plan.
2) Failed to implement and follow HUD/FHA's Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program requirements.
3) Charged borrowers excessive and duplicative fees.
4) Failed to disclose all charges to borrowers on the Good Faith Estimates.
5) Submitted a false certification to HUD on its Title II annual Verification Report.
6) Failed to timely notify HUD that one of its officers had been indicted for an offense that reflected upon AMC's responsibility and integrity and its ability to participate in HUD programs.
7) Failed to timely notify HUD that a state banking department suspended the mortgagee's mortgage origination license.
8) Failed to provide a disclosure of a Controlled Business Arrangement when a settlement service provider was involved in the loan transaction with whom the lender had an ownership or other beneficial interest.
9) Failed to report serious violations identified during a QC review.
10) Failed to ensure that HUD/FHA's Construction-Permanent Mortgage Program requirements were met.
11) Failed to ensure that maximum mortgage amounts were properly calculated, resulting in over-insured mortgages.
12) Failed to ensure that there were no discrepancies between disbursements and/or sales prices on HUD-1 settlement statements or documents used to calculate loan amounts.
13) Failed to ensure that appraisal report findings were consistent or otherwise acceptable; and failed to ensure that properties located in Special Flood Hazard Areas were properly covered with flood insurance.
14) Approved loans with debt-to-income ratios that exceeded HUD/FHA standards without significant compensating factors.
15) Failed to properly calculate and/or document the income used to qualify borrowers.
16) Improperly omitted recurring liabilities from underwriting analyses.
17) Failed to properly document the source of gift funds or assets; failed to ensure that the maximum insured mortgage amount was properly calculated, resulting in an over-insured mortgage.
18) Charged unallowable fees to mortgagors and collected processing fees from borrowers which it then paid directly to a contract processing company.
19) Failed to include mandatory elements in its adopted QC Plan.
20) Failed to conduct mandatory QC servicing reviews.
21) Failed to timely notify HUD of changes in the mortgagor and/or servicer of FHA-insured loans.
22) Failed to timely notify HUD and terminate insurance after FHA-insured loans were paid in full.
23) Failed to properly report loan statuses and reasons for default into HUD's Single Family Default Monitoring System.
24) Failed to notify HUD within ten days of its entrance into two consent orders with a state banking department.
25) Failed to notify HUD within ten days of changes affecting its standing as an approved institution.
26) Submitted false certifications to HUD in connection with transactions in which the mortgagee allowed non-employees to originate FHA loans.
27) Violated HUD/FHA minimum staffing requirements by allowing one of its branch offices to operate without a branch manager.
28) Implemented a written employee policy and executed contractual agreements that violated HUD/FHA requirements.
29) Processed a HECM loan prior to the borrower's receipt of HECM counseling.
30) Failed to file Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C-compliant reports for calendar certain years.
31) Failed to ensure that loan applications were processed by authorized employees who worked exclusively for the mortgagee.
32) Distributed an advertisement that misrepresented HUD/FHA's HECM program requirements in a mailer envelope that simulated a government form.
33) Failed to notify HUD that the mortgagee had ceased its business operations.
34) Approved a loan that exceeded HUD's maximum mortgage amount.
35) Failed to comply with a condition of the mortgagee's FHA approval and submitted false and misleading information to HUD in connection with the mortgagee's application for FHA approval.
36) Failed to adequately document the income used to qualify the borrower.
37) Used conflicting information in originating and obtaining HUD/FHA mortgage insurance.
38) Failed to document the source of funds used for the down payment and/or closing costs.
39) Omitted liabilities from the underwriting analysis without adequate documentation.
40) Failed to analyze borrowers for loss mitigation in a timely manner.
41) Failed to perform management/foreclosure reviews.
42) Failed to input accurate codes into HUD/FHA's Single Family Default Monitoring System.
43) Failed to foreclose on properties in accordance with HUD/FHA guidelines.
44) Failed to ensure QC reviews were completed for early payment defaults.
45) Engaged in a prohibited branch arrangement by allowing a separate mortgage company to function as a branch office.
46) Failed to uphold its agreement with HUD to only originate direct mortgages through its direct lending branch.
47) Failed to register a branch office.
48) Posted the HUD seal on a website maintained by a loan officer.
49) Failed to notify HUD of reportable business changes.
50) Failed to ensure that documents were not signed in blank.
Line-Webpage
LIBRARY
Law Library Image
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Mortgagee Review Board: Administrative Actions
Federal Register: 76/146
July 29, 2011

Friday, March 4, 2011

HUD: Reinstates Emergency Relief

HUD is implementing an interim rule that reinstates, with certain modifications, regulations that it formerly published to serve as the framework by which emergency relief may be provided to homeowners experiencing temporary involuntary loss of employment or underemployment resulting in a substantial reduction in income due to adverse economic conditions, and who consequently are financially unable to make full mortgage payments. 
These regulations were promulgated following enactment of the Emergency Homeowners' Relief Act of 1975. This 1975 statute provided standby authority to the Secretary to insure or make loans to homeowners to defray mortgage expenses, so as to prevent widespread mortgage foreclosures and distress sales of homes resulting from a homeowner's substantial reduction income. 
Although the 1975 regulations were quickly put in place, they were not utilized, and HUD eventually removed the regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations in 1995.
Dodd-Frank reauthorized the 1975 statute, with certain amendments, and made $1 billion available for this 1975 program during Fiscal Year (FY) 2011. Accordingly, HUD is reinstating the regulations for the program, under the title of "Emergency Homeowners' Loan Program" (EHLP) with such modifications as necessary to mirror the statutory changes to the Emergency Homeowners' Relief Act of 1975 made by Dodd-Frank.
Effective: April 4, 2011.
Comment Deadline: May 3, 2011.

Post Separator-2-LCG
Outline
1) Clarifies that the principal residence of the homeowner for which the homeowner seeks relief to prevent foreclosure may be a condominium, a cooperative, or a manufactured home.
2) Includes the list of eligible institutions for which HUD is authorized to provide insurance for emergency mortgage relief loans and advances of credit as provided in section 105 of the Emergency Homeowners' Relief Act. (The list of these institutions was not revised by the Dodd-Frank Act but was omitted from the 1975 regulations.
3) Provides that an eligible homeowner must have a total annual income (as defined in these regulations, and hereafter referred to as "income") that is equal to, or less than, 120 percent the area median income (AMI), as determined by HUD and adjusted for household size. (HUD defines AMI in Sec. 2700.5 of the rule.)
4) Provides that an eligible homeowner must have incurred a substantial reduction of income, as a result of involuntary loss of employment or underemployment, that is at least 15 percent lower than the income the homeowner had prior to loss of employment or underemployment.
5) Requires, consistent with the statute, that the aggregate amount of assistance to an eligible homeowner cannot exceed $50,000.
6) Provides that eligible homeowners may receive assistance for up to 12 months, in accordance with criteria established by HUD, and that such assistance may be extended once for up to 12 additional months, or may receive assistance in an amount up to the statutory ceiling of $50,000, whichever occurs first. (NOTE: the Federal Register, which reactivates the program for FY 2011, provides for eligible homeowners to receive assistance for up to 24 months, or up to the statutory ceiling amount of $50,000. Given the duration of high unemployment, HUD has determined that so long as eligibility requirements are maintained, HUD will provide the maximum period of 24 months of homeowner assistance at the outset.)
7) Provides, as did the 1975 regulations, that emergency assistance may be provided only if the homeowner has a back-end ratio or debt-to-income (DTI) below 55 percent (principal, interest, taxes, insurance, revolving and fixed installment debt divided by total monthly income). (For this calculation, the homeowner's income will be measured at the pre-Event level.) Homeowners with second mortgage debt or equity lines of credit may qualify for emergency assistance if the homeowner's DTI is within the program's 55 percent limit.
8) Includes monitoring requirements to ensure that the homeowner remains eligible for the emergency assistance after such assistance has commenced, and also specifies the conditions under which emergency assistance to the homeowner will be terminated.    
9) Adds a declining balance, nonrecourse, zero interest, subordinate secured loan, with a term of up to 7 years, as a type of repayment mechanism for emergency mortgage relief payments.

Post Separator-2-LCG
Visit Library
Law Library Image
Emergency Homeowners' Loan Program (EHLP)
Interim rule, HUD, FR 76/43
March 4, 2011
Line-Webpage

Thursday, December 23, 2010

FHA: Extends Deadlines for DE Mortgagees & Loan Correspondents

By Jonathan Foxx

Jonathan Foxx, former Chief Compliance Officer of two publicly traded financial institutions, is the President and Managing Director of Lenders Compliance Group, the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country.

Line-Webpage

On December 20, 2010, FHA Commissioner David H. Stevens announced an extension of deadlines for obtaining unconditional Direct Endorsement Approval to July 1, 2011 and a temporary and narrow extension (with conditions) of FHA-Approval for Loan Correspondents to March 31, 2011.

The deadlines were given in Mortgagee Letter 2010-20 (June 11, 2010), and the Final Rule published in the Federal Register, which set forth the following revisions affecting DE Mortgagees and Loan Correspondents:

  • Increased Net Worth Requirements
  • Elimination of Loan Correspondent Approval for Single Family Programs
  • Principal-Authorized Agent Relationships
  • Areas Approved for Business

The waivers provide the following applicability:

For DE Mortgagees: The effective date for the Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Section 202.3(a)(3) (as amended by the April 20, 2010 Final Rule) requires that an FHA-approved mortgagee have unconditional Direct Endorsement approval under Section 203.3 in order to serve as the principal in a Principal-Authorized Agent origination is waived until July 1, 2011.

For Loan Correspondents: A loan correspondent will maintain its FHA approval past December 31, 2010, but in no event past March 31, 2011, solely for purposes of closing mortgage loans in its name for which, as of December 31, 2010, either: (1) HUD has issued a firm commitment for insurance; or (2) a DE underwriter has approved the mortgagor for such mortgage. The FHA approval of the loan correspondent will expire on December 31, 2010, for all other purposes.

In my nationally published article, entitled FHA Issues Guidance for Lender Approvals (July 2010), I discussed the many changes that would be required by implementation of Mortgagee Letter 2010-20. (Article)

We have also issued numerous Compliance Alerts and Mortgage Compliance Updates regarding these changes, including:

  • FHA: Net Worth and Lender Approval Final Rules To Be Issued (4/7/2010)
  • FHA: Net Worth and Lender Approval Advance Issuance Final Rule (4/14/2010)
  • FHA: Net Worth and Lender Approval Final Rule Published in Federal Register (4/20/2010)

Please visit our Archive for relevant posts.

It is critical that all DE mortgagees set forth and clearly delineate policies, procedures, approval guidelines, operational plans, quality control requirements, and many other features of FHA and regulatory compliance with respect to properly implementing Mortgagee Letter 2010-20.

Our clients now have their policies and procedures in place to support the Final Rule.

ACTION! If your organization has not drafted policies and procedures to comply with Mortgagee Letter 2010-20, we urge you to do so immediately.

On December 22, 2010, I participated in a conference call with FHA Single Family Housing staff to discuss these extensions. I will have more to discuss in a future notification.

Please don't wait for the last minute to prepare for and implement the requirements of Mortgagee Letter 2010-20!

Best regards,
Jonathan

Line-Webpage

Temporary Extension of Deadline for Obtaining
Unconditional Direct Endorsement Approval
Extended to July 1, 2011

FHA is extending the deadline for obtaining unconditional direct endorsement (DE) approval for those DE-eligible entities that wish to participate as a Principal in Principal-Authorized Agent originations.

  • A Principal-Authorized Agent origination is a type of FHA origination by two FHA-approved mortgagees, neither of which is a loan correspondent. The Principal-Authorized Agent relationship is used when the two FHA-approved lenders originate a loan together and both need access to the loan file in FHA Connection. In a Principal-Authorized Agent origination, the Principal must originate the loan, and the Authorized Agent must underwrite the loan.

NOTE: The Final Rule changed Principal-Authorized Agent relationship originations to require that both lenders (Principal and Authorized Agent) possess unconditional direct endorsement approval. This requirement was to take effect January 1, 2011.

Without this extension, these non-DE mortgagees will only be able to participate in the origination of single family loans on or after January 1, 2011 as sponsored originators until they have obtained unconditional DE approval.

All other changes to Principal-Authorized Agent requirements in the Final Rule will take effect January 1, 2011, as previously announced in Mortgagee Letter 2010-20.

FHA mortgagees that do not obtain unconditional direct endorsement approval by July 1, 2011, can no longer act as Principals. However, they may continue to pursue unconditional approval through the test case process and may participate in originations of FHA single family loans as sponsored Originators.

Line-Webpage

Temporary and Narrow Extension
of FHA-Approval for Loan Correspondents
Extended to March 31, 2011 (with conditions)

The final rule provided that FHA-approved Loan Correspondents may close FHA-insured mortgages in their names until December 31, 2010. However, a significant number of Loan Correspondents have mortgage loans that have been assigned FHA case numbers but are unlikely to close by December 31, 2010.

Since FHA will no longer be approving Loan Correspondents after December 31, 2010, they will be statutorily prohibited from closing FHA-insured mortgage loans in their own names. If FHA did not extend that deadline, the inability of currently approved Loan Correspondents to close mortgage loans in their names will likely disrupt the loan processes of a significant number of lenders.

Because of this, FHA is granting a temporary extension of FHA-approval for currently approved Loan Correspondents with pipeline loans that meet certain criteria for the narrow purpose of allowing these loans to close in the Loan Correspondents' names.

This extension will extend FHA-approval of currently approved Loan Correspondents for the narrow purpose of permitting existing loans in their pipelines to close in their names.

This extension will only apply to loans in which a case number has been assigned and the loan has been approved by a DE underwriter as of December 31, 2010. The extension will expire March 31, 2011.

  • The extension only applies to loans for which, as of December 31, 2010:
  1. HUD has issued a firm commitment for insurance; or
  2. A DE underwriter has approved the borrower for such loan (i.e., the lender has received and accepted approval via TOTAL Scorecard or has manually underwritten the loan).
  • This approval includes the DE underwriter review and approval of the appraisal. Loans eligible for this waiver must close by March 31, 2011.
  • The FHA approval of all Loan Correspondents for all other purposes will expire on December 31, 2010.

All other pipeline loans that do not meet these criteria and have not closed prior to January 1, 2011, must close in the name of an approved FHA Lender/Sponsoring Lender.

Line-Webpage

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image

FHA: Waiver - Extension of Effective Date for the DE Mortgagee Approval Requirement for Principal Mortgagee in 24 CFR § 202.3 (a)(3)
December 20, 2010

Line-Webpage

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Yield Spread Premium: Excluded from HOEPA

By Jonathan Foxx

Jonathan Foxx, former Chief Compliance Officer of two publicly traded financial institutions, is the President and Managing Director of Lenders Compliance Group, the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country.

Line-Webpage

As you may know, I have lectured extensively and written many articles relating to the Yield Spread Premium (YSP).

And I will continue to track issues involving the YSP.

Here are some of my recent articles:

  • Service Release Premium vs Yield Spread Premium: Match or Mismatch?
  • Saving the Yield Spread Premium
  • Yield Spread Premiums: Compensation or Kickback?

During the course of this multi-year, ongoing review, I have been following litigation that affects the YSP.

Just such litigation that has national implications is the recent decision on November 30, 2010 by the Louisiana Supreme Court, which held that the YSP is excludable from the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA) calculation.

On one side was The Bank of New York (Bank) and on the other side was Kathleen Johnson Parnell (Parnell) along with amici curiae such as the National Consumer Law Center, Center for Responsible Lending, and the Southeastern Louisiana Legal Services.

At risk was the interpretation of the FRB's Official Staff Commentary to the Truth in Lending Act as well as a public attempt to portray the lender in the worse possible light.

I thought you might find this recent decision of interest.

Best wishes,
Jonathan

Line-Webpage

Overview

The Louisiana Supreme Court held that a YSP paid by a lender to a mortgage broker is not part of the "total points and fees payable by the consumer at or before closing," within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1602(aa)(1)(B) of HOEPA.

To quote the ruling itself: "Because the YSP in this case was paid by the lender not the borrower/consumer, the YSP is not included in the calculation for determining the applicability of HOEPA."

The Court used the Truth In Lending Act as its source and relied on a provision in the Federal Reserve Board's Official Staff Commentary of Regulation Z to find that mortgage broker fees which are not paid by the consumer are not included in the HOEPA "points and fees" calculation.

Indeed, the Court cited the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) in its amending of 15 U.S.C. § 1602(aa)(1) replacing "points and fees payable by the consumer at or before closing" with "points and fees payable in connection with the transaction."

The Court decided that "the YSP in this case was not payable [by the consumer] at or before closing as required by the applicable version of 15 U.S.C. § 1602(aa)(1)(B)."

Line-Webpage

Some Case Facts

Fact Pattern
1) 2001: Kathleen Johnson Parnell (Parnell) executed an adjustable rate promissory note secured by her home.
2) Loan was originated through a mortgage broker.
3) HUD-1 Settlement Statement stated that the lender paid the mortgage broker a YSP in the amount of $1,264, which was paid outside closing.
4) 2003: Parnell attempted to rescind the security interest under the Truth In Lending Act claiming:
4-A) that her loan was governed by HOEPA (because points and fees exceeded 8% of the total loan amount), and
4-B) that she had not been given the requisite disclosures.

Dispute
1) Parnell's rescission demand was denied because the threshold requirement of HOEPA was not met, being the total amount of points and fees of only 6.7%.
2) The difference between these calculations rested on the inclusion of the YSP.

Litigation
1) Parnell defaulted on her note.
2) The Bank filed a petition for executory process seeking to seize and sell her home.
3) Parnell filed a petition to suspend the seizure and sale of her home, alleging, among other things, a violation of HOEPA for failing to provide statutorily-required disclosures.
4) The Bank filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking the dismissal of all claims asserted by Parnell primarily on the basis that Parnell's loan was not subject to HOEPA because a YSP paid by a lender is not included in the points and fees calculation.
5) Parnell opposed the Bank's motion arguing that the YSP was ultimately paid by her over the life of the loan and that "all compensation paid to mortgage brokers" constitute "points and fees" under HOEPA.
6) The trial court granted the Bank's motion for summary judgment.
7) Louisiana Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit reversed on appeal.
8) Louisiana Supreme Court decided that those portions of the appellate court decision that reversed the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the Bank as to Parnell's HOEPA and wrongful seizure claims are reversed. And, with respect to these two claims, the judgment of the trial court was reinstated.

Line-Webpage

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image
The Bank of New York, Acting Solely in Its Capacity As Trustee for
EQCC Trust 2001-2 v. Kathleen Johnson Parnell

No. 2010-C-0435 (LA: 11/30/2010)

Line-Webpage

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Monday, November 29, 2010

HUD: Will Not Change Interpretive Rule

On June 25, 2010, we notified you about the National Association of Realtors asking the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for clarification on an unofficial staff interpretation HUD had issued on February 21, 2008 regarding Home Warranty Companies.

In that interpretation, HUD's Office of General Counsel opined that services performed by real estate brokers and agents on behalf of a home warranty company (HWC) are compensable as additional settlement services if the services are actual, necessary and distinct from the primary services provided by the real estate broker or agent, and allowed that the real estate broker or agent may accept a portion of the charge for the homeowner warranty only if the broker or agent provides services that are not nominal and for which there is not a duplicative charge.

HUD's Office of General Counsel published an Interpretive Rule which interprets Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and HUD's regulations as they apply to the compensation provided by home warranty companies to real estate brokers and agents. Generally, an interpretive rule is exempt from public comment, but HUD offered a comment period.

After reviewing the comments received, on November 23, 2010 HUD determined that changes are not needed to the interpretative rule.

An interpretive rule does not change existing law. It represents HUD's interpretation of its existing regulations.

Therefore, this interpretive rule does not constitute a change in HUD's interpretation of RESPA or the RESPA regulations, but is an "articulation" of HUD's interpretation of RESPA and the implementing regulations that specifically apply to home warranty company payments to real estate brokers and agents.

Highlights

Interpretive Rule

1) A payment by an HWC for marketing services performed by real estate brokers or agents on behalf of the HWC that are directed to particular homebuyers or sellers is an illegal kickback for referral under Section 8 of RESPA.

2) Depending upon the facts of a particular case, an HWC may compensate a real estate broker or agent for services when those services are actual, necessary and distinct from the primary services provided by the real estate broker or agent, and when those additional services are not nominal and are not services for which there is a duplicative charge.

3) The amount of compensation from the HWC that is permitted under Section 8 of RESPA for such additional services must be reasonably related to the value of those services and not include compensation for referrals of business.

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image

HUD: RESPA - Home Warranty Companies' Payments to Real Estate Brokers and Agents, Interpretive Rule: Response to Public Comments, Questions and Answers
November 23, 2010

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

HUD: Solicits Comments on Warehouse Lending

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is seeking information on how funding mechanisms have evolved in recent years, and especially on how warehouse lending currently operates within residential real estate mortgage transactions.

HUD is requesting comments from:

· warehouse lenders,

· retail lenders,

· mortgage bankers,

· wholesale lenders,

· correspondent lenders,

· mortgage brokers,

· and others in the mortgage lending industry,

· federal, state, and local consumer protection and enforcement agencies;

· consumer groups;

· and other members of the public.

On November 16, 2010, HUD announced the solicitation of comments from the public regarding the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) with respect to Warehouse Lending and Other Loan Funding Mechanisms. HUD last issued regulations in this area in 1992 and 1994.

Based on information received in response to this solicitation, HUD intends to decide what, if any, additional guidance is needed on the scope of RESPA as applied to current mortgage funding practices.

Comments can be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or to the office of General Counsel.

The announcement has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

The comment period will expire 30 days after publication of HUD's announcement in the Federal Register.

Line-Webpage

HIGHLIGHTS

10 Broad Questions

1. What are the general characteristics of warehouse lending in the context of mortgage loan financing?

2. What particular characteristics distinguish warehouse lending from retail lending? What is the role of warehouse lending within the primary mortgage market versus the secondary market?

3. What distinguishes the funding of a mortgage loan from a sale of the mortgage loan in the secondary market? For example, what characteristics indicate a bona fide transfer of the loan obligation, such that the transaction would be a secondary market transaction that is not covered by HUD's RESPA regulations?

4. What role does a warehouse lender play in a table funded transaction?

5. What, if any, characteristics distinguish a table funded transaction completed by a mortgage broker from a loan made by a mortgage banker who has an advance commitment to sell the loan after settlement?

6. Does a warehouse lender fund mortgage loans within the meaning of "settlement service" as that term is defined in section 2 of RESPA and 24 CFR 3500.2?

7. What factors determine who is identified as the payee on the mortgage loan note?

8. Have concerns about protection under bankruptcy laws influenced changes in how warehouse lenders operate in relation to loan originators?

9. What do warehouse lenders regard as being their obligations for providing the disclosures required under RESPA?

10. Do consumers or others have concerns with regard to mortgage industry participants' current interpretation of HUD's secondary market exemption, including the impact that such interpretations may have on consumers regarding coverage of RESPA disclosures and Section 8 protections against kickbacks and referral fees?

Line-Webpage

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image

"Solicitation of Information on Changes in Warehouse Lending
and Other Loan Funding Mechanisms"
RESPA: Notice pending publication in the Federal Register
November 16, 2010

Line-Webpage

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

FHA: Announces HECM SAVER Program

On September 1, 2010, we notified you in a Compliance ALERT [FHA's "HECM Saver" - Uncorroborated (9/1/10)] about the uncorroborated reports concerning HUD-FHA's new HECM Saver program. At the time, there was no direct confirmation yet from HUD regarding the new HECM Saver: no Press Release from HUD, no statement from HUD in the Federal Register, and so forth - only, as of that writing, rumors and hints. However, we continued to monitor this matter closely and promised to provide the actual HUD-FHA issuance, including guidelines, when and if the new HECM Saver is offered.

We now have corroboration in the form of Mortgagee Letter 2010-34 (9/21/10) of this second option in HUD-FHA's Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) Program.

The new HECM Saver is a second initial mortgage insurance premium (MIP) option, for the purpose of lowering upfront loan closing costs, for mortgagors who want to borrow a smaller amount than what would be available with a "HECM Standard."

Effective: On or after October 4, 2010, mortgagors may select either HECM Saver or HECM Standard as an initial MIP.

Highlights

Initial and Monthly Premiums
HECM Saver - MIP Chart

  • For HECM Saver, the initial MIP will be 0.01 percent (0.01% or 0.0001) of the maximum claim amount (MCA), and is collected at time of loan closing. For HECM Standard, the amount of initial MIP will continue to be 2 percent (2% or 0.02) of the maximum claim amount, which also is collected at the time of loan closing.
  • MIP for both HECM Saver and HECM Standard will be charged monthly at an annual rate of 1.25 percent (1.25%) of the outstanding loan balance.

Availability of HECM Saver and HECM Standard

HECM Saver and HECM Standard are available for:

  • all HECM transaction types (traditional, purchase and refinance);
  • all five payment plans (tenure, term, line of credit, modified tenure and modified term);
  • all interest rate indices (Constant Maturity Rate and London Interbank Offered Rate);
  • adjustable rate mortgages (monthly and annual); and
  • fixed interest rate mortgages

Initial MIP Calculation for Refinance Transactions

For all refinance transactions, mortgagees and counselors must use the formula below to determine the amount of initial MIP due for both HECM Saver and HECM Standard.

Formula:

1. New MCA multiplied by new initial MIP (%) = New MIP

2. Old MCA multiplied by old initial MIP (%) = Old MIP

3. Subtracting the result of (2) from the result of (1) yields the MIP amount owed to HUD

Other Areas Covered in Mortgagee Letter

  • Principal Limit Factor Table
  • FHA Connection Case Number Assignment Screen Changes
  • Pipeline of HECMs
  • Adaption of Legal Documents

_______________________________________

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Program -
Introducing HECM Saver

Mortgagee Letter 2010-34, September 21, 2010

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

FHA: Short Refinance Option

On August 9, 2010, we notified you of FHA's issuance of Mortgagee Letter 2010-23 (8/6/10), which announced the FHA Short Refinance program. We also provided Highlights of the product.

The Short Refinance concept was originally announced in March 2010. In our email we noted that the Short Refinance would be available on September 7, 2010, and will continue to be available until December 31, 2012. The Short Refinance is meant to offer an additional refinancing option for underwater borrowers.

On September 7, 2010, FHA announced the launch of the Short Refinance loan product.

This refinance program offers certain "underwater" non-FHA borrowers who are current on their existing mortgage and whose lien holders agree to write off at least ten (10%) percent of the unpaid principal balance of the first mortgage, the opportunity to qualify for a new FHA-insured mortgage.

This loan product is obviously targeted to help people who owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth - also known as being "underwater" - because their local markets saw large declines in home values.

Participation in FHA's Short Refinance program is voluntary and requires the consent of all lien holders.

If you have any questions about this matter,
please contact Jonathan Foxx.
Email Icon

_____________________________________

Highlights

Eligibility

The homeowner must:

  • owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth.
  • be current on their existing mortgage.
  • qualify for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements.

The property must:

  • be the homeowner's primary residence.

The first lien holder must:

  • agree to write off at least 10% of their unpaid principal balance

The existing loan to be refinanced must:

  • not be an FHA-insured loan.

The new refinanced loan must:

  • have a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 97.75 percent and a combined loan-to-value ratio no greater than 115 percent.

Second lien holders:

  • who agree to full or partial extinguishment of the liens receive incentives.

Servicers:

  • must execute a Servicer Participation Agreement (SPA) with Fannie Mae on or before October 3, 2010.

Visit Library for Issuances

Law Library Image

FHA Refinance of Borrowers in Negative Equity Positions
Mortgagee Letter 2010-23
August 6, 2010

________________________________________

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

FHA: HECM "Saver" - Uncorroborated

According to news reports circulated since August 27, 2010, the HECM Saver is on the way! Sources are alleging a conference call with Vicky Bott, HUD's Deputy Assistant Secretary, in which she supposedly announced plans to implement a new variant of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, referred to as the "HECM Saver," that will provide seniors with a reverse mortgage option that significantly lowers upfront costs by virtually eliminating the upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium that is required under the current HECM option.

Bott is also alleged to have said that there will be accompanying changes intended for the existing HECM product, now to be referred to as a "HECM Standard," and that the HECM Saver and changes to the HECM Standard are expected to be effective in early October 2010.

Apparently, this new report is said to have emanated originally from the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA), which has no such announcement on its website.

There is no direct confirmation yet from HUD regarding this new HECM Saver: no Press Release from HUD, no statement from HUD in the Federal Register, and so forth - only, as of this writing, rumors and hints.

We will monitor this matter closely and provide the actual HUD-FHA issuance, including guidelines, when and if the new HECM Saver is offered.

For questions about this matter
or assistance with mortgage compliance,
please contact Jonathan Foxx, Managing Director.

Email Icon

_____________________________________________

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Monday, August 9, 2010

FHA Launches “Underwater” Refinances

On August 6, 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued Mortgagee Letter 2010-23, which announced the FHA Short Refinance program.

Available on September 7, 2010, the loan product will enable lenders to provide additional refinancing options to homeowners who owe more than their home is worth – or “underwater.” The FHA Short Refinance will continue to be available until December 31, 2012.

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will offer certain non-FHA borrowers, who are current on their existing mortgage and whose lenders agree to write off at least ten (10%) percent of the unpaid principal balance of the first mortgage, the opportunity to qualify for a new FHA-insured mortgage.

To be eligible for a new loan, homeowners must owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth and be current on their existing mortgage. Homeowners must qualify for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements and have a credit score equal to or greater than 500. The property must be the homeowner's primary residence.

The borrower's existing first lien holder must agree to write off at least 10% of the unpaid principal balance, bringing the borrower's combined loan-to-value ratio to no greater than 115%. The existing loan to be refinanced must not be an FHA-insured loan, and the refinanced FHA-insured first mortgage must have a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 97.75%.

U.S. Department of Treasury will provide incentives to existing second lien holders who agree to full or partial extinguishing of the liens. To be eligible, servicers must execute a Servicer Participation Agreement (SPA) with Fannie Mae, in its capacity as financial agent for the United States, on or before October 3, 2010.

HUD estimates that between 500,000 and 1,500,000 borrowers will refinance using these enhancements and the net economic benefits will be between $11.774 and $35.322 billion.

Highlights

Eligibility

Participation is voluntary and requires the consent of lien holders. In order for a loan to be eligible, the following conditions must be met:

1. The homeowner must be in a negative equity position;

2. The homeowner must be current on the existing mortgage to be refinanced;

3. The homeowner must occupy the subject property (1-4 units) as their primary residence;

4. The homeowner must qualify for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements and possess a "FICO based" decision credit score greater than or equal to 500;

5. The existing loan to be refinanced must not be a FHA-insured loan;

6. The existing first lien holder must write off at least 10 percent of the unpaid principal balance;

7. The refinanced FHA-insured first mortgage must have a loan-to-value ratio of no more than 97.75 percent;

8. Non-extinguished existing subordinate mortgages must be re-subordinated and the new loan may not have a combined loan-to-value ratio greater than 115 percent;

9. For loans that receive a "refer" risk classification from TOTAL Mortgage Scorecard (TOTAL) and/or are manually underwritten, the homeowner's total monthly mortgage payment, including the first and any subordinate mortgage(s), cannot be greater than 31 percent of gross monthly income and total debt, including all recurring debts, cannot be greater than 50 percent of gross monthly income;

10. FHA mortgagees are not permitted to use premium pricing to pay off existing debt obligations to qualify the borrower for the new loan;

11. FHA mortgagees are not permitted to make mortgage payments on behalf of the borrowers or otherwise bring the existing loan current to make it eligible for FHA insurance; and

12. The existing loan to be refinanced may not have been brought current by the existing first lien holder, except through an acceptable permanent loan modification as described below.

Salient Features of Program

  • Principal Write Off
  • Calculating Mortgage
  • Underwriting Requirements
  • Current Mortgage
  • Acceptable Credit History
  • Combined Loan-to-Value Ratio
  • Permissible Secondary Financing
  • Borrower Certification
  • Mortgage Type and ADP Codes
  • Second Lien Extinguishment and Servicer Incentive

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image

FHA Refinance of Borrowers in Negative Equity Positions
Mortgagee Letter 2010-23
August 6, 2010

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Portrait of Homelessness: Costs and Interventions

Three recent studies on homelessness in the United States examine the cost of first-time homelessness, life after transitional housing for homeless families, and strategies for improving access to mainstream benefits and services. The reports were issued by HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research.

Three Studies:

  • Costs Associated with First-Time Homelessness for Families and Individuals
  • Strategies for Improving People's Access to Mainstream Benefits and Services
  • Life after Transitional Housing for Homeless Families

Some History

Homelessness has migrated toward rural and suburban areas. There were 1.6 million homeless people in shelters in 2009. The number of homeless people has not changed dramatically but the number of homeless families has increased, according to a 2009 HUD report.

The United States Congress appropriated $25 million in the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Grants for 2008 to show the effectiveness of Rapid Re-housing programs in reducing family homelessness.

In February 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,  part of which addressed homelessness prevention, allocating $1.5 billion for a Homeless Prevention Fund. The funding for it was called the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP). It was distributed using the formula for the Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) program.

On May 20, 2009, President Obama signed the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act into Public Law (Public Law 111-22 or "PL 111-22"), reauthorizing HUD's Homeless Assistance programs. It was part of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009 (HEARTH). The goal of the HEARTH Act is to prevent homelessness, offer rapid re-housing, consolidate housing programs, and create new homeless categories. In the eighteen months after the bill's signing, HUD must make regulations implementing this new McKinney program.

In late 2009, some homeless advocacy organizations, such as the National Coalition for the Homeless, reported and published perceived problems with the HEARTH Act of 2009 within the framework of the McKinney-Vento Reauthorization bill, especially with regard to privacy, definitional ineligibility, community roles, and restrictions on eligible activities.

As the foreclosure epidemic continues to grow, the population of the homeless is also increasing. This puts considerable strain on municipal, state, and federal resources as well as faith-based outreach efforts. HUD's programs are one of several means to respond to this situation. And, as is the case with so much of the economic crisis and recession, there is no single solution to some of these intractable problems.

Highlights

Research Findings

Research Report
Costs Associated with First-Time Homelessness for Families and Individuals

  • For homeless individuals, emergency shelter is typically the least expensive response and transitional housing is the most expensive.
  • For homeless families, emergency shelters and transitional housing programs were equally expensive, usually due to the amount of services families receive in both program models and the higher cost of providing families with accommodations that have a greater degree of privacy than individuals require.
  • Permanent supportive housing for both individuals and families is less expensive to the homeless assistance response system, as service costs are borne by other systems, such as Food Stamp or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs.

Research Report
Strategies for Improving People's Access to Mainstream Benefits and Services

  • Communities with the greatest success had a strong central organization intent on improving access of homeless persons to mainstream services.
  • Communities were usually able to reduce structural barriers to benefits (such as physical access, complexity and length of application processes) and rules for documenting eligibility.
  • Communities were less successful in overcoming barriers beyond their control, such as eligibility requirements for various programs and limited capacity of mainstream service providers.
  • Communities have developed innovative ways to overcome barriers to mainstream benefits, but some barriers can only be resolved with state or federal involvement.

Research Report
Life after Transitional Housing for Homeless Families

  • Individuals benefited from educational and employment opportunities that help change life circumstances.
  • Children benefited from having fewer moves and school changes.
  • Families leaving transitional housing moved to their own place, and 60 percent remained in their homes 12 months later.
  • No relationship was established between the number of barriers to stability that a family faces, the length of stay in transitional housing, and the outcomes of the stay.

Families with relatively few challenges remained in transitional housing for long durations and may be using such assistance while waiting for subsidized housing to become available.

Visit Library for Issuances

Law Library Image

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
-Costs Associated with First-Time Homelessness for Families and Individuals
-Strategies for Improving People's Access to Mainstream Benefits and Services
-Life after Transitional Housing for Homeless Families

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Treasury Announces: Housing Finance Conference

In April 2010, Treasury and HUD issued a set of questions for public comment on the future of the housing finance system, which has received more than 300 responses from a broad cross-section of consumer groups, industry groups, market participants, members of the public, think tanks, and other stakeholders.

These responses are meant to provide input and perspective in the development of a comprehensive reform proposal. Written comments should have been sent to the Treasury for receipt by June 21, 2010 to be assured of consideration.

On August 17, 2010, the Treasury will host a Conference on the Future of Housing Finance in Washington D.C. This event brings together leading academic experts, consumer and community organizations, industry groups, market participants, and other stakeholders for an open discussion about housing finance reform.

If you have any questions about this matter or would like assistance with mortgage compliance, please contact Jonathan Foxx, Managing Director.

Highlights

Questions

1. How should federal housing finance objectives be prioritized in the context of the broader objectives of housing policy?

2. What role should the federal government play in supporting a stable, well-functioning housing finance system and what risks, if any, should the federal government bear in meeting its housing finance objectives?

3. Should the government approach differ across different segments of the market, and if so, how?

4. How should the current organization of the housing finance system be improved?

5. How should the housing finance system support sound market practices?

6. What is the best way for the housing finance system to help ensure consumers are protected from unfair, abusive or deceptive practices?

7. Do housing finance systems in other countries offer insights that can help inform U.S. reform choices?

Visit Library for Issuance

Law Library Image

Public Input on Reform of the Housing Finance System
Department of the Treasury and Department of Housing and Urban Development

Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 77, Notices (4/22/10)

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

FHA Issues Guidance for Lender Approvals

by Jonathan Foxx

Jonathan Foxx, former Chief Compliance Officer of two publicly traded financial institutions, is the President and Managing Director of Lenders Compliance Group, the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country.

As published in the July 2010 Edition of National Mortgage Professional Magazine.

Download Article-1A

On June 11, 2010, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued Mortgagee Letter 2010-20,[1] which provided the long-awaited guidance regarding the implementation of its Final Rule.[2] The Final Rule adopted changes pertaining to the approval of mortgage lenders by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) that are designed to strengthen FHA by improving its management of risk.

This Final Rule, among other things, has increased the net worth requirement for FHA-approved mortgagees and also provided for elimination of the FHA approval process for loan correspondents. Loan correspondents will no longer be approved participants in FHA programs, but they will continue to have the opportunity to participate in FHA programs as third-party originators (TPOs) through sponsorship by FHA-approved mortgagees, as is currently the case, or through application to be approved as an FHA-approved mortgagee.

In eliminating the FHA's approval of loan correspondents, FHA-approved mortgagees assume full responsibility to ensure that a sponsored loan correspondent adheres to the FHA's loan origination and processing requirements.

Increased Net Worth Requirements: Two Phases

HUD is phasing in the increased net worth mandates through 2013.

Phase One

The first stage of Phase One has already passed, since all new applicants for FHA approval, beginning on May 20, 2010, must now possess a net worth of at least $1,000,000. And the net worth must consist of at least 20 percent (20%) in liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).

The second stage, which begins on May 20, 2011, is a little tricky, since a metric is introduced using a Small Business Administration statute in order to bifurcate lender approval criteria. On and after that date, a standard will be applied using the Table of Small Business Size Standards for a small business, as defined by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR 121.201, Sector 52 (Finance and Insurance), Subsector 522 (Credit Intermediation and Related Activities).[3]

  • Effective May 20, 2011, lenders that exceed the size standards as provided in the above-cited statute must possess a net worth of at least $1,000,000, of which no less than 20 percent (20%) must be liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).[4]
  • Effective May 20, 2011, lenders that meet the size standards as provided in the above-cited statute must possess a net worth of at least $500,000, of which no less than 20 percent (20%) must be liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).

The most recent August 2008 Table of Small Business Size Standards, published through the Small Business Administration, indicates the following thresholds:

clip_image002

A size standard is the largest that a concern can be and still qualify as a small business for Federal Government programs.[5] From the table above, it should be noted that SBA’s current requirements for classification as a small business, as set forth in this Subsector, are less than $7 million in annual receipts for non-depository institutions and less than $175 million in assets for depository institutions.[6]

Phase Two

Phase Two begins on May 20, 2013 and affects the category of participation in FHA programs. Identify the institution’s participation to determine the net worth thresholds:

  • Single Family Programs. Minimum net worth of not less than $1,000,000 plus an additional net worth of one percent (1%) of the total volume in excess of $25 million of FHA single family insured mortgages originated, underwritten, purchased, or serviced during the prior fiscal year, up to a maximum required net worth of $2.5 million. Not less than 20 percent (20%) of a mortgagee’s required net worth must be liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).
  • Participation in Multifamily Programs with Engagement in Mortgage Servicing. Minimum net worth of not less than $1,000,000 plus an additional net worth of one percent of the total volume in excess of $25 million of FHA multifamily insured mortgages originated, underwritten, purchased, or serviced during the prior fiscal year, up to a maximum required net worth of $2.5 million. Not less than 20 percent of a mortgagee’s required net worth must be liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).
  • Participation in Multifamily Programs without Engagement in Mortgage Servicing. Minimum net worth of not less than $1,000,000 plus an additional net worth of one half of one percent of the total volume in excess of $25 million of FHA multifamily insured mortgages originated, underwritten, or purchased during the prior fiscal year, up to a maximum required net worth of $2.5 million. Not less than 20 percent of a mortgagee’s required net worth must be liquid assets (i.e., cash or cash equivalent).
  • Participation in Single Family and Multifamily Programs. The higher net worth requirements for single family mortgagees.

Evidencing net worth is now requiring a higher due diligence review process, since all mortgagees (i.e., supervised, investing, and non-supervised), with the exception of government mortgagees, are required to submit audited financial statements as a condition of their approval or renewal.

Download Article-1A

Loan Correspondent Approval for Single Family Programs

Approvals

Effective May 20, 2010, FHA no longer accepts any new applications for loan correspondent approval. FHA will complete the processing of loan correspondent applications received prior to that date for those entities. If an application for loan correspondent approval was received by FHA on or after May 20, 2010, the application and fee will be returned to the applicant.

Loan correspondents approved and in good standing will be permitted to retain their approval through December 31, 2010. For loan correspondents with fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009, and that were required to renew their FHA approval prior to May 20, 2010, FHA will rely on the submission of the prior year’s audited financial statements for the renewal of loan correspondent approval.[7]

Therefore, loan correspondents whose fiscal years ended on or before December 31, 2009 had to submit the Yearly Verification Report, the applicable recertification fee, and audited financials. Loan correspondents whose fiscal year ends after December 31, 2009 are required to submit the Yearly Verification Report and the applicable recertification fee, but not audited financials.

After December 31, 2010, loan correspondents (i.e., Third-Party Originators, so-called “TPO”s) will only be permitted to continue participation in FHA programs by establishing a sponsorship relationship with an FHA-approved mortgagee. Indeed, loan correspondents will no longer have access to non-public FHA systems, beginning January 1, 2011 (i.e., FHA Connection). Only FHA-approved mortgagees will be permitted to order FHA case numbers from the FHA Connection. HUD will provide future guidance, with respect to the processing of case numbers ordered prior to the January 1, 2011.[8]

Originations

HUD will hold FHA-approved mortgagees responsible for compliance with FHA requirements in all aspects of an FHA loan transaction, whether performed by the approved mortgagee or by its sponsored TPO (unless applicable law or regulation governing the violations in question require specific knowledge on the part of the party to be held responsible). It is, therefore, critical that sponsoring FHA-approved mortgagees set forth and clearly delineate policies, procedures, approval guidelines, quality control requirements, and many other features of FHA and regulatory compliance, with respect to their sponsored TPOs.[9]

  • Approved as of May 20, 2010: may continue to originate mortgage loans insured by FHA through the end of the calendar year.
  • Non-approved originators (and expired approvals) - sponsored: permitted to participate through sponsorship by an FHA-approved Direct Endorsement mortgagee. An FHA-approved mortgagee may permit its sponsored TPO to perform all origination and processing tasks related to an FHA loan transaction (except for FHA Connection access). Sponsoring FHA-approved mortgagees will determine the “exact origination and processing duties their sponsored third party originators may perform.”[10]
  • An approved mortgagee may permit a sponsored TPO to originate Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs), provided that the sponsored third party originator adheres to all other HECM origination requirements.
  • Because of updates that HUD must make to its data systems, sponsoring mortgagees will enter their 5 digit FHA ID in FHA Connection as the loan originator for sponsored TPO loans; that is, for the time being all loan originations from sponsored TPOs will appear in FHA’s systems as a retail origination of the sponsoring mortgagee. (HUD hopes to have their data systems updated by September 30, 2010.)
  • FHA-approved mortgagees will not be permitted to use a Direct Lending branch office identification number to order case numbers for loans originated by sponsored TPO, because this identification number can only be used to originate direct-to-consumer loans obtained by the FHA-approved mortgage through the Internet and Call Centers.
  • Underwriting and approvals will be performed by an FHA-approved mortgagee for all loans originated by sponsored TPOs. Once approved by the sponsoring FHA-approved mortgagee, a loan must close in the name of the sponsoring underwriting mortgagee.[11] Finally, HUD officials fielded several questions regarding the current prohibition on closing an FHA-insured loan in the name of a TPO. The Department’s representatives acknowledged that HUD cannot change the prohibition on TPOs closing in their own names unless and until Congress amends the National Housing Act. As you may know, H.R. 5072, the FHA Reform Act of 2010, would accomplish this goal. This piece of legislation was recently passed in the House of Representatives and currently awaits deliberation in the Senate.
  • HUD will hold FHA-approved mortgagees responsible for compliance with FHA requirements in all aspects of an FHA loan transaction, whether performed by the approved mortgagee or by its sponsored third party originator, unless applicable law or regulation governing the violations in question require specific knowledge on the part of the party to be held responsible. HUD expects that FHA-approved mortgagees will pursue sponsoring relationships with responsible originators, and that approved mortgagees will diligently monitor and evaluate the activities and performance of those they sponsor. The Department will continue to carefully review and evaluate FHA-approved mortgagees’ activities and performance, and will take appropriate action to enforce its requirements when violations occur.

Loan Performance

  • Neighborhood Watch will post data for all loans originated via a sponsored TPO, and will be made available only to FHA-approved mortgagees for the purpose of evaluating sponsored TPO origination trends and performance

Third Party Fees

  • HUD will review all fees charged to a consumer by both FHA-approved lenders and TPOs and will hold the lender accountable for all of the fees charged, including those charged imposed by a TPO. Acceptable fees will be those that appear to be reasonable, common, and customary for the geographic area.[12]
  • Broker consulting fees, which are charged by a broker, must be paid outside of closing from the consumer’s own funds, and must be compliant with RESPA guidelines.[13]

Employment Requirements

FHA’s employment requirements for approved mortgagees and lenders are outlined in Chapter 2 of Handbook 4060.1, Rev. 2. FHA-approved mortgagees shall ensure that sponsored third party originators involved in FHA loan transactions adhere to all applicable federal, state, and local requirements governing their FHA loan origination and processing activities.

HUD will no longer monitor TPOs and will not impose restrictions on employment. Therefore, sponsored TPO employees can be paid on a W-2 or 1099 basis, and can have dual employment (i.e., mortgage originator as well as real estate agent). Also, there will be no “brick and mortar” requirements for sponsored TPOs.[14]

As a reminder to currently approved mortgagees and lenders, HUD prohibits HECM mortgage originators from also engaging in the sale or solicitation of other financial or insurance products. FHA-approved mortgagees must carefully evaluate the specific guidelines governing the programs and activities in which they wish to participate, as well as relevant state and local laws and regulations governing such activities.

Download Article-1A

Principal-Authorized Agent Relationships

Principal-Authorized Agent relationships can now only be entered into by two FHA-approved mortgagees, both of which must possess unconditional Direct Endorsement approval. This relationship, and the respective roles of the parties involved, must be documented accurately and accordingly in FHA Connection. Additional time is needed to support such documentation in FHA Connection. Due to impending system changes necessary to support and validate Principal-Authorized Agent transactions, FHA is issuing a regulatory waiver that will delay implementation of this provision until January 1, 2011.[15]

  • For Forward mortgages, the principal can have either unconditional DE or unconditional HECM approval. The authorized agent must have unconditional DE approval.
  • For HECM mortgages, the principal can have either unconditional DE or unconditional HECM approval. The authorized agent must have unconditional HECM approval.
  • The Principal in these relationships must originate the loan and the Authorized Agent must underwrite the loan.
  • The loan may close in either the name of the Principal or the Authorized Agent, and either party may submit the loan for insurance endorsement.

Areas Approved for Business (AAFB)

FHA-approved mortgagees may underwrite sponsored TPO loans in any state in which they are permitted by the state to do so, and in which sponsored TPOs are permitted to conduct mortgage origination activities. Hence, an FHA-approved mortgagee’s wholesale AAFB consists of all states in which it sponsors a mortgage originator that meets the applicable requirements for loan origination of that state and in which the mortgagee is permitted by the state to underwrite mortgage loans and sponsor mortgage originators.[16]

HUD will provide more detailed requirements for the submission of sponsored third party originator loans in a subsequent Mortgagee Letter. That Mortgagee Letter will include instructions for data submission and the process for ordering and transferring FHA case numbers for loans originated by sponsored third party originators.

New Form 92900-A: Addendum to the URLA

HUD intends to amend Form 92900-A (Addendum to the Uniform Residential Loan Application) in order to obtain information related to sponsored TPOs.[17] The new form will add additional boxes for a TPO’s legal name, tax identification number, and Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System Registry (“NMLSR”) number for the company (if applicable). A date of mid-September 2010 is anticipated for implementation of the new form.

Download Article-1A

If you have any questions about this matter or would like assistance with mortgage compliance, please contact Jonathan Foxx, Managing Director, or call 516-442-3456.


[1] Mortgagee Letter 2010-20, June 11, 2010, Implementation of Final Rule FR 5356-F-02, “Federal Housing Administration: Continuation of FHA Reform-Strengthening Risk Management through Responsible FHA-Approved Lenders”

[2] April 20, 2010 at 75 FR 20718, with technical correction published on May 4, 2010 at 75 FR 23582.

[3] Under the final regulations, small businesses are those that meet the size standard for their industry classification established by the Small Business Administration at 13 C.F.R. § 121.201 Sector 52 (Finance and Insurance), Subsector 522 (Credit Intermediation and Related Activities). Non-small businesses are those lenders and mortgagees that exceed this size standard. Id. at 20,734 [citing new Section 202.5(n)(iii)].

[4] Under the final regulations, small businesses are those that meet the size standard for their industry classification established by the Small Business Administration at 13 C.F.R. § 121.201 Sector 52 (Finance and Insurance), Subsector 522 (Credit Intermediation and Related Activities). Non-small businesses are those lenders and mortgagees that exceed this size standard. Id. at 20,734 [citing new Section 202.5(n)(iii)].

[5] U. S. Small Business Administration Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry Classification System Codes, August 22, 2008, p29 (Data – 2007)

[6] Op.cit. 1, Footnote (2)

[7] See Mortgagee Letter 2009-01: Loan correspondents must submit the online annual certification and the annual renewal fee or be subject to administrative action leading to the possible withdrawal of their FHA approval.

[8] Industry Conference Call, June 29, 2010: hosted by HUD to summarize the new regulatory changes and the corresponding guidance provided in Mortgagee Letter 2010-20.

[9] Additionally, FHA’s employment requirements for approved mortgagees and lenders, as outlined in Chapter 2 of Handbook 4060.1, Rev. 2, requires FHA-approved mortgagees to ensure that sponsored TPOs involved in FHA loan transactions adhere to all applicable federal, state, and local requirements governing their FHA loan origination and processing activities.

[10] Op.cit. 1, p 4

[11] The current prohibition on closing in a TPO’s name cannot be changed until Congress amends the National Housing Act. The FHA Reform Act of 2010 (HR 5072), which was recently passed in the House and currently awaits deliberation in the Senate, would accomplish this goal.

[12] Op.cit. 8

[13] Op.cit. 8

[14] Op.cit. 8

[15] Op.cit. 8

[16] Mortgagees will order case numbers for any state in which they are approved to underwrite an FHA loan. Until system modifications are made, mortgagees will need to enter their 5 digit ID in the Sponsor field in FHA Connection’s case number assignment screen.

[17] Op.cit. 8